FRUITVALE STATION (2013)

July 13, 2013

fruitvale1 Greetings again from the darkness. It’s not politically correct to criticize this movie, yet it seems only fair to treat it as I do every other movie on which I comment. If that sounds like a bashing is coming, you are mistaken. In fact, this is an emotionally-charged, well written and exceptionally well-acted movie that provides much anticipation for the future projects of its first time director Ryan Coogler. However, in my opinion, it is also flawed in its “Based on a True Story” placard that is then followed by much manipulation (3 Oprah references), some of which could even be considered misleading.

If you are unfamiliar with the tragic story, 22 year old Oscar Grant was inexplicably shot and killed (while subdued and face down) by a BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) cop after watching New Year’s Eve fireworks with his girlfriend and buddies. An altercation/fight occurred on the train and the officers pulled Grant aside to detain/arrest. Much of this was caught on cell phone video by train passengers, and the aftermath brought protests in the city. The officer was tried and found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to two years. He claimed he mistook his gun for his Taser.

fruitvale4 No one can argue that this was anything but a senseless tragedy. Director Coogler even begins his movie with actual cell phone footage of the incident. The ending is known and seared in the viewer’s mind before the story even begins. Whether the senseless shooting was racially driven is a topic for debate, but the current media focus on the George Zimmerman trial, and his killing of Trayvon Martin, makes the timing of this movie quite compelling.

Coogler certainly points out that Grant (adeptly played by Michael B Jordan) was no angel. We learn about his prison stints, his drug dealing, his unfaithfulness to his girlfriend (the mother of his daughter), his lack of responsibility (losing his job due to chronic absence), his string of lies, and most glaringly … his terrifyingly quick and violent temper. My issue with the film is the seemingly inordinate amount of time Coogler spends on the flip side — the focus on Oscar’s desire to get his life back on track. So fruitvale2much effort and so many scenes are written to exhibit how Oscar is a charming guy with a big heart. He helps out a white lady in the grocery store, he takes a big step towards leaving the drug dealing life, he plans his mother’s birthday party, heck … he even cradles a poor dog that was hit by a car. This inequity in storytelling apparently has only one purpose … to create another symbol of racial injustice. We are not left to ponder if the real Oscar is the one who inspires his daughter to brush her teeth or the one who bows up to a foul-mouthed convict, rather than ignore him. Instead, Coogler wants us to believe that Oscar was now a good guy who had put his past behind him … all in the 24 hours leading up to his death.

The fact is, there are two sides of Oscar, just like everyone has multiple facets to their personality. Most of us learn to control the sides that don’t mesh well with society … others really struggle to do so. Michael B Jordan delivers a powerful performance as Oscar, and he and Octavia Spencer (who plays his mom) will both garner awards attention. Other supporting work is provided by Melonie Diaz as his girlfriend, Ariana Neal as his precious daughter, Ahna O’Reilly as the shopper, and Kevin Durand and Chad Michael Murray as the BART cops.

fruitvale3 This film was the hit of both Sundance and Cannes, and was produced by Forest Whitaker. A major tip of the cap to BART for allowing the filmmakers to work on location at the actual Fruitvale station, for a level of authenticity. Coogler chooses one last bit of manipulation with his closing video of Oscar’s daughter Tatiana at a recent memorial outside of Fruitvale station … followed by on screen text of the officer’s two year sentence. We get no details on the trial, only the assumption that the sentence does not deliver justice, but rather another example of racial bias.

Lastly I’ll say that the decision to make a dramatization rather than a documentary was interesting. This allowed the director to focus on Oscar the good guy. A documentary would have required facts from the trial, a better perspective of the train disturbance and probably fewer Oprah references. The dramatization makes the movie more emotionally charged and more effective at inspiring outrage, rather than debate. Despite all of that, this is extraordinary filmmaking from a first time director, and I will certainly look forward to Ryan Coogler’s next project.

**NOTE: An interesting take on the real life events that led Oscar to this moment, could have been an analysis of the many decisions he made in his short life. Parents are always trying make their kids understand that every decision and every choice has a consequence. What if Oscar had never dealt drugs or gone to prison?  The altercation on the train would not have occurred and the tragedy would have been avoided.  I am by no means blaming Oscar for what happened that night, it’s just another example of how even the smallest decisions add up to impact our life.

***WARNING***

Rather than post the trailer to the film, I have elected instead to post a 1:42 YouTube video of the actual incident,  The video is short but contains very harsh language and you can hear the gun shot.  It is not easy to watch and certainly not appropriate for kids

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0P8TSP2YJU&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DS0P8TSP2YJU&has_verified=1

 

 


THE WAY WAY BACK (2013)

July 13, 2013

way way1 Greetings again from the darkness. This is one of those indies that has all the pieces in place to be not just a terrific “little” movie, but also a surprise box office hit.  It played well at festivals, critics love it, it has a very talented cast, it mixes humor with human emotion, and the co-directors and co-writers won an Oscar (with Alexander Payne) for writing the script to The Descendants.  It even offers the often effective coming-of-age story line in regards to Duncan (played by Liam James) as a miserable 14 year old stuck at a beach house with him mom, her obnoxious boyfriend and his snobby daughter.

The movie has a touch of “The Wonder Years” (without the narrator), but it’s a bit more caustic thanks to Steve Carell, who plays Trent, the condescending and bullying boyfriend who has no redeeming qualities that we can see (other than an inherited beach house and a nice tan).  It’s very unusual to see Carell in the “bad guy” role, but once you accept it, his lines and way way3lies cut through each scene.  Duncan’s mom is played by Toni Collette, and her character Pam is a divorced, insecure single mom trying to balance her own happiness with that of her teen-angst-filled son. Pam and Duncan are the outsiders in this beach community as we quickly learn when next door neighbor Betty (Allison Janney) barges across property lines (and personal space) with drink in hand and gossip flying.

Feeling further humiliated by his encounters with Betty’s cute daughter, Duncan finally gains a ray of hope thanks to Owen, the man-child manager of the Water Wizz park.  Sam Rockwell plays Owen, and quickly becomes a mentor to him by offering him a job and what I call … Water Wizzdom.  Of course, Duncan keeps the job a secret from the others in his life, and since they are mostly oblivious to his long absences, it proves again how self-centered the adults are in this little would-be family.

way way2 The well worn movie signs are all here … we recognize the characters and their struggles, in fact, we all know someone like each of the people that co-writers and co-directors Nat Faxon and Jim Rash present to us. We understand quickly that this is yet another coming-of-age tale with mostly clueless adults, and kids trying to cope on their own. Despite that, this one still mostly works. The writing and acting are such high quality that even though we are living in movie cliché-land, we still find ourselves caring about Duncan and Pam, laughing at Owen, and tossing tomatoes at Trent (Carell).

Special recognition to Sam Rockwell. Even though Duncan is the key character, it’s Rockwell’s Owen who recognizes that a little faith and encouragement goes a long way. Behind the facade of rapid-fire banter and laugh-inducing one-liners, Owen is coming to grips with a life of reality and shattered dreams. While never stooping to the typical Hollywood “win one for the Gipper” speech, Owen manages to instill a bit of confidence in Duncan … to the point where he refuses to let his mother pretend everything is OK with Trent.

way way4 AnnaSophia Robb plays the cute girl-next-door who recognizes potential in Duncan, but the filmmakers never allow this to turn into some ridiculous fairy tale. Instead we get characters who are each flawed, but real and recognizable. While all the typical pieces are present, there is enough crackle to the dialogue and quality acting to help this one rise above the usual muck. It’s a nice “little” alternative to the giant summer blockbusters. Nat Faxon and Jim Rash have shown again that they have a gift for dialogue and now a talent for guiding actors.  In this, their directorial debut, they prove that they also have skills as filmmakers. We should expect the next one to be even better!

**NOTE: you may think this looks like another Little Miss Sunshine, but it really flips the percentages in comedy vs drama

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: quirkiness and caustic dialogue mixed with some humorous and familiar coming-of-age moments are what you are looking for this summer movie season OR you want to see Steve Carell play something other than a nice guy

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: if you are seeking light-hearted summer fluff … this one is filled with uncomfortable family drama

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qoaVUdbWMs


FIRST HALF RECAP – 2013

July 9, 2013

Most years, July 1 rolls around and I get kind of excited to put together my first half movie recap. This year … not so much. Simply put, it has not been a good six months for new movies.  Surprisingly, the box office is right in line with 2012, and actually, this summer season is running a bit ahead of last year.  Despite my disappointment in the quantity of quality films, there are a few that provided a nice movie-going experience — just not enough of them!

One thing that provided a cinematic boost was attending the Little Rock Film Festival (LRFF) with my long-time friend Lawrence. Three days of cramming in as many indie films and documentaries as possible, while gaining insight directly from the filmmakers, made for a great time … and contributed a few of my favorites so far this year.

Rather than dwell on the disappointments, let’s go through some of the bright spots. As is customary, these will not be presented in any particular order.  That chore is reserved for my end of year recap, which gets posted each January.

DOCUMENTARIES

20 feet 20 Feet from Stardom – Just now building an audience as it gains theatre distribution throughout the country, it’s alternately heart-breaking and heart-warming as we meet the real people behind the artists known as back-up singers. The interviews are mesmerizing and though the music is uplifting, there are life lessons to be learned from Darlene Love, Lisa Fischer and Merry Clayton.

Gideon’s Army – another LRFF gem, and it introduced me to the hardworking folks that make up the Public Defenders force. While this one will make you grateful for your chosen profession, it will also make you appreciative of the efforts given by these mostly anonymous attorneys.  You can catch this one on HBO.

Muscle Shoals – saw this one at LRFF, and was shocked to learn so much about the influence of producer Rick Hall and his FAME studios in Alabama on the beloved music from the 50’s – 70’s. I have now been enlightened.

Stories We Tell – directed by Sarah Polley, this one plays like watching someone else’s home movies … and that’s just about what it is. Ms. Polley provides a personal example of the power of family secrets. She interviews her brothers and sisters, and spends much time with her fascinating father.

CLASSIC FILMS

If you are a regular reader of my blog, I probably sound like a broken record in regards to this topic. Should you be fortunate enough to live in a market where the theatres periodically show “classic” films, I encourage you to take advantage. Two of my favorites so far this year are Jurassic Park 3D and Lawrence of Arabia. These two movies are not only amazing stories with interesting characters, but they are spectacular on the big screen. It doesn’t matter if you have seen them before … don’t miss the classics in a theatre!

POPCORN

MOS2 Shorthand for tentpoles, blockbusters, and big budget extravaganzas, these “big” movie productions did what they are designed to do … provide entertaining escapism with a “WOW” factor:

Iron Man 3 – if you are a fan of the series, you will appreciate the wise-cracking Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) returning to the role that is all about fun,  wild action and effects.

Man of Steel – rather than focus on Clark Kent, director Zack Snyder teamed with Christopher Nolan to deliver a most interesting backstory for Superman (Henry Cavill) that will surely lead to more movies. Casting Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner as Superdads was genius.

The Great Gatsby – very divisive film that turned off many, while thoroughly entertaining many others. Director Baz Luhrman visualizes F Scott Fitzgerald as hip-hop and glitzy.

OTHERS

mud1 42 – A slick version of Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball. Harrison Ford turns an interesting Branch Rickey, and this is one the whole family can see.

 Much Ado About Nothing – director Joss Whedon films his close knit group of friends performing a modernized version of Shakespeare’s romantic comedy.

Mud – gritty little film that moves at its own pace and sucks the viewer right into this world of small town deception.  Matthew McConaughey and young Tye Sheridan turn in outstanding performances.

The Iceman Michael Shannon simmers on screen as notorious Mob hitman Richard Kuklinski, who killed more than 100 people over 35+ years … all while maintaining the façade of a happily married family man.

Being the eternal movie optimist, I fully expect some great (and I use that term judiciously) movies during the second half. The proposed line-up includes more entries into the superhero genre, the next “Hunger Games” and “Hobbit”, a couple of interesting Sci-Fi projects, a remake of the horror classic Carrie, a documentary on JD Salinger, the much anticipated August: Osage County, more from the Coen Brothers, Martin Scorcese, Andrew Payne, Spike Lee, David O Russell and Lee Daniels … and yes, the sequel to Anchorman.

Let me know your favorites so far this year, and I’ll see you at the movies!


THE LONE RANGER (2013)

July 6, 2013

lone ranger Greetings again from the darkness. The Western genre has always appealed to me. I love the clear division between good and bad. Heroes and Villains face-off and the good guys usually win, thereby protecting those too weak to protect themselves. TV had an impressive string of popular westerns: “The Rifleman”, “Maverick”, “The Big Valley”, “Rawhide”, “Bonanza”, and “Gunsmoke” (1955-75).

One of the most popular got it’s start on the radio in 1933: “The Lone Ranger“. When it hit TV in 1949, the great Clayton Moore donned the mask and badge, accompanied by Jay Silverheels as Tonto. Though they filmed a couple of movies, they were best known on the small screen. Then in 1981,  The Legend of the Lone Ranger was released in theatres. It was directed by William Fraker and starred Klinton Spilsbury. If you have never seen it … Mr. Fraker never directed another movie and Mr. Spilsbury never acted again. Enough said.

lone ranger2 Thirty-three years later, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, director Gore Verbinski and mega-star Johnny Depp have teamed up for a re-imagined Tonto and the Lone Ranger story. Yes, that is the proper order since this is mostly the story of Tonto, told by Tonto, with the camera focused on Tonto (Depp). There is very little respect for the roots of the story, and that’s probably because it would not be politically correct these days to have a subservient Comanche taking orders from a masked white man.

We first meet an aging Tonto as the “Noble Savage” in a 1933 Old West traveling museum. This approach reminds me of the far superior Little Big Man featuring Dustin Hoffman. Tonto proceeds to tell a young boy his version of history. We are never really sure if this is a tall tale or just a commentary on how our memory recalls events solely from our own perspective. Tonto’s character is given a full backstory, but John Reid, the square and square-jawed prosecutor who Tonto mentors into becoming the lone ranger4Lone Ranger (played by Armie Hammer) is presented as a naive buffoon. Reid’s courageous brother Dan is played by James Badge Dale, and the bad guys are played by Tom Wilkinson (Cole, the train baron), and William Fichtner (Butch Cavendish, the notorious outlaw who wiped out the Rangers).

It seems apparent that Verbinski was striving to create the next Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. The template is familiar … lots of action and wise-cracking, replete with the newest caricature in the Johnny Depp repertoire. Though Depp has many critics, I am not one. To me, he is a modern day Red Skelton, and I admire the nuances of his Captain Jack Sparrow, Wily Wonka, Mad Hatter, and of course, Edward Scissorhands. Tonto is another feather in his cap (so to speak) and his decision to base the look on Kirby Sattler’s painting “I Am Crow” adds a stark look along with fodder for comedy.  Depp performs an impressive stunt featuring a tall ladder and two trains … it plays like a tribute to the great Buster Keaton.

lone ranger3 Many film critics have been bashing the production – some even before the film’s release. In this day of information overload, we all are aware of the battle between the filmmakers and the studio. The final product does in fact wear the scars of entirely too many writers and budget mismanagement and limitations that come with the Disney brand. What should have been a perfect fit (ultimate good guy Lone Ranger) turned into a jumbled mess at times. The 2 1/2 hour movie easily could have been a full hour shorter. Maybe building two new locomotives worked great for realism, but was tough on the budget. With so few young movie-goers even aware of the Lone Ranger, creative freedom to re-imagine the character makes sense, but making him a klutzy sidekick probably doesn’t. So what we get are pre-release headlines telling us the film is a bomb. I find that unfair. It certainly appeared that most of the audience I was part of enjoyed the movie, though there were cracks about how long it was.

There are some very impressive segments within the film and having Rossini’s William Tell Overture playing over the heart-pounding climax adds a level of fun that most movies don’t have. The use of Monument Valley in Utah put me in the mood for a John Ford movie marathon.  So while I fully agree that the movie is much too long, the script should have been tightened, and more respect paid to the main character, it seems highly likely that the movie will be remembered much more fondly than film critics would have us believe … at least by those who give it a shot.

**NOTE: if you are unfamiliar with the legend, Britt Reid who became The Green Hornet, is the great nephew of John Reid (The Lone Ranger).

**NOTE: I totally missed the significance or tie-in of the blood-thirsty rabbits in this movie, though they did remind me of Monty Python’s Killer Rabbits.  If you “get” this, please explain to me.

**NOTE: Helena Bonham Carter.  ugh

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: you can ignore the critics and accept this as another blockbuster summer fun flick OR you want to see the latest addition to the Johnny Depp Hall of Oddity

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you are expecting the All-American hero as seen in the long ago TV series (this is really not his story)

Below are two videos.  The first is the 27 second opening to the TV series.  The second is one of the full trailers to the new movie:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td4RHvyAFsM

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L5pbgKyWs4


GOLDEN VOICES OF THE SILVER SCREEN

July 2, 2013

voices - mic

 Why the void?

So often, the conversation turns to movies. Well, at least around my house it does.  A casual comment from Jen (my son’s fiancé) spurred a flurry of discussion and name-calling.  No, we weren’t verbally assaulting each other; rather we were reacting to her casually wondering aloud where all the actors with great voices have gone.  Perhaps you have noticed the void … more likely you haven’t.  The previous abundance of golden voices on the silver screen has devolved into a mass of nondescript, sometimes unrecognizable voices that rarely dominate a scene or command an audience.

My initial response to this conundrum was to note that today’s movie stars spend little or no time on stage in front of a live audience … the ultimate training ground for impactful voices. Sure, a few big time actors will take on a limited run for a play, but nothing like the years of consistent stage work from many of the stars of yesteryear.

voices - gregory peck Deeper analysis, a little research, and conversations with some people whose opinions I value, has led me to a more sociological-related conclusion. Our “ideal man” has changed.  Corresponding to that change was a distinct transition in the type and style of voices sought for acting roles. For decades (and even longer), the ideal man was often described as “the strong silent type”. Being heroic meant not just fighting for our country in the string of wars (WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, et al) but also carrying the burden of family bread-winner and protector, even during the Great Depression.  A real man’s actions spoke volumes, while his words were spoken rarely.  When he did have something to say, his words cut straight to the point and were delivered with a strong, deep voice that commanded, even demanded attention. The example would be Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird.  This was the image of man which every boy strived for and most women expected.

Then, along came the late 1960’s … hippies and rebellion … and a new movement. Authority figures were no longer above reproach.  Every societal norm came under scrutiny, and with this came a different style of role model.  The ideology of the strong silent type was being challenged by the intellectually vociferous types … the skeptical, quick-witted ones voices- phil donahuewho poetically debated for a more equal and open society.  When 1970 rolled around, “The Phil Donahue Show” was unleashed nationally. In 1971, “All in the Family” introduced us to Archie Bunker (Carroll O’Connor) as the grumpy “old school” man struggling to hold onto his traditional world that was being overrun by idealists (Meathead). And then in 1972, “M*A*S*H” hit TV.  Alan Alda’s Hawkeye Pierce showed us what the new ideal man was … unafraid to question authority, driven to expose system inequities, void of any desire for heroics, and above all, not just unafraid, but actually anxious to share his emotions.   Archie Bunker became the butt of jokes.  Alan Alda’s charm and often whiny voice was winning over women and taking macho men off the hook.  Phil Donahue was invoking his harried, high-pitched plea to guilt his guests into conveying the emotions necessary to publically open the long-closed lines of communication between men and women.  The world had changed and there was a new definition of “man” … and he was expected to talk a lot!

Movies are a reflection of the times, so Hollywood’s leading men have been evolving and transitioning ever since Alda and voices - cary grantDonahue raised the pitch of their voices to rip down the old façade of what makes a man. Where once we had High Noon with Gary Cooper standing tall and delivering his sparse dialogue with a deep authoritative voice, we soon had Sleepless in Seattle and the ultimate sensitive single dad (Tom Hanks) speaking gently and kindly to his young matchmaker son atop the Empire State Building (yes, it’s a remake … compare Cary Grant’s 1957 voice in An Affair to Remember to that of Hanks in the 1993 version).  The changing ideal of manliness corresponded to the dramatic shift in the screen voices of men.  Rather than leading men in the mold of Charlton Heston and Richard Burton, we were seeing and hearing the likes of Dustin Hoffman, Al Pacino (pre-bellowing years), Robert Redford and even Woody Allen. This is probably the most opportune time to point out that this comparative analysis is, by nature, a sexist undertaking. This is not meant as a slight on actresses, it’s simply a focused look at the dramatic and distinctive changes in the voice of male movie actors over the past few decades.

Of course, judging the “great” voices is a combination of opinion and general perception. An attempt was made to not simply be fooled by an elegant British accent, a charming Aussie mate, or a distinguished Frenchman.  Vocal resonance, timbre, tone and screen impact were the keys. Debate is encouraged in regards to those included, as well as those omitted. What is clear is that the imbalance between the “Over 50” and “Under 50” would be comical, if not so startling … and believe it when I say that another twenty names could easily be added to the older group, while the younger group failed to produce any others that were even borderline.

GOLDEN VOCAL CORDS – this is the group of actors who have a voice that resonates and becomes part of their character and persona.  The list is broken into age groups and includes some of the all-time greats (some no longer with us), as well as some still working today:

Golden Voices, age 50 plus:   Yul Brenner, Richard Burton,  Sean Connery,  Kirk and Michael Douglas, Michael Clarke voices - james earl jonesDuncan,  Sam Elliott, Morgan Freeman, James Garner, John Gielgud, Cary Grant, Fred Gwynne, Richard Harris, Dennis Haysbert, Charlton Heston, Anthony Hopkins, John Houseman, Rock Hudson, James Earl Jones, Boris Karloff, Ben Kingsley, Kris Kristofferson,  Frank Langella, Christopher Lee, Dean Martin, Lee Marvin, James Mason, Malcolm McDowell, Ian McKellen, Liam Neeson, Leslie Nielsen, Leonard Nimoy, Gregory Peck,  Sidney Poitier, Christopher Plummer, Vincent Price, Jason Robards, George C Scott, Robert Stack, Patrick Stewart, Donald Sutherland, Max von Sydow, Denzel Washington, Orson Welles, Paul Winfield

Golden Voices, under age 50: Benedict Cumberbatch, Armie Hammer, Hugh Jackman, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson

voices - hugh jackmanIf you believe I am discriminating against the younger group, here is a list of some of the top actors in the under-50 age group.  I look forward to hearing which of these you believe belong in the GOLDEN VOCAL CORDS group:

Other Actors under age 50: Ben Affleck, Casey Affleck, Christian Bale, Javier Bardem, Jay Baruchel,  Michael Cera, Bradley Cooper, Daniel Craig, Russell Crowe, Matt Damon, Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert Downey Jr, Jesse Eisenberg, Michael Fassbender, James Franco, Andrew Garfield, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ryan Gosling, Jonah Hill,  Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Josh Hutcherson, Shia LaBeouf, Tobey Maguire, James McAvoy, Clive Owen, Robert Pattinson, Joaquin Phoenix, Chris Pine, Brad Pitt, Keanu Reeves, Jeremy Renner, Chris Rock, Ryan Reynolds, Mark Ruffalo, Liev Schreiber, Michael Shannon, Channing Tatum, Mark Wahlberg

What I noticed about this last group, is that rather than possessing a booming stage-ready voice, many fall into the “Mumbling” category made famous by the likes of Marlon Brando, James Dean, Johnny Depp, Clint Eastwood, and Sean Penn.  The italicized names in the group above are those that I believe easily fall into “Mumbling”.

At this point, you may be thinking exactly what I was … there are still some very recognizable movie voices that have not been mentioned. This worthy of attention group has been labeled “DISTINCTIVE”.

DISTINCTIVE VOICES:  Ed Asner, Antonio Banderas, Humphrey Bogart, Powers Boothe, Ernest Borgnine, Walter Brennan, voices - hugo weavingJeff Bridges, Steve Buscemi, James Cagney, James Coburn, Peter Falk, Clark Gable, Samuel L Jackson, Peter Lorre, Matthew McConaughey, Groucho Marx, Walter Matthau, Robert Mitchum, Jack Nicholson, Edward G Robinson, Al Pacino, Arnold Schwarzenegger, William Shatner, Jimmy Stewart, George (“Oh my”) Takei, Christopher Walken, John Wayne, Hugo Weaving.

Taking a look at the “Other Actors under age 50” group, it seems that Chris Rock and Jesse Eisenberg are really the only ones who belong in the “Distinctive” group, unless you include Keanu Reeves’ trademark “Whoa” or Mark Wahlberg’s highly recognizable Southie use of the “f-word”.

What all of this means is still a bit cloudy, but it’s clear that neither a great nor distinctive speaking voice is critical to earning a nice living as an actor these days. Heck, we haven’t even categorized Tom Hanks, Robert DeNiro, Tom Cruise, Daniel Day Lewis or Dustin Hoffman … five of the most successful actors of the last 40 years.  What’s also clear is that a transformation has occurred in the acting world. The age imbalance for “Golden” and “Distinctive” voices is proof … what’s not quite so clear is exactly WHY.

Using your best Don LaFontaine (the late, great voice actor known for movie trailers) voice, let me hear you say … “In a world where … the golden voices of the silver screen seem to have disappeared” …which actors under age 50 would you include on the list?   (You’ll have to use the comments section for me to really “hear” you)

Here is a little inspiration to get you in the Golden Voice mood.  It’s a mash-up of Don LaFontaine’s trailer work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjWKE-IJ4R8


20 FEET FROM STARDOM (2013)

July 1, 2013

20 feet1 Greetings again from the darkness. “And the colored girls go do doo doo, do doo …”. The controversial lyrics from Lou Reed’sWalk on the Wild Side” kick off this exceptional documentary about the oft-ignored back-up singers who have played (and continue to play) a huge role in some of the biggest songs of all-time. You may not know their names, but you have undoubtedly sung along with them while driving or taking a shower.

Director Morgan Neville has a credit list filled with music shorts and documentaries. One of my personal favorites of his is “The American Masters” on Muddy Waters. I recalled that while watching this one because Neville does a nice job of connecting the dots from Gospel, Blues and Soul to the roots of Rock and Roll. The main women featured here all admit to being daughters of preachers, and fine-tuning their ability to harmonize during their youth while singing in the church choir.

20 feet5 Most of the interview time and insight comes from Darlene Love, Lisa Fischer, and Merry Clayton. You may not recognize the names or faces, but you will surely recognize the voices. Ms. Love has been elected to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and may be best known thanks to her annual appearance on the David Letterman Show at Christmas. Ms. Fischer is the most frequent worker today of the three as she tours with Chris Botti, Sting and The Rolling Stones. However, the heart-stopping climax of the film belongs to Merry Clayton, as we are treated to her isolated vocals from the master on her infamous performance on the single “Gimme Shelter“. Hearing her raw voice blast out “Rape. Murder. It’s just a shot away” is both exhilarating and gut-wrenching. To hear her tell the story is mesmerizing. One of my favorite movie moments ever.

20 feet2 While we see and hear the personal stories filled with frustration and regrets, we also see an inherent love of music and the appreciation for their particular gift. We also hear from Tata Vega, Dr. Mabel John (a former Raelette for Ray Charles), and Claudia Lennear. With many similar stories of their quest for solo careers, we get the contemporary version with Judith Hill, a twenty-something working back-up today as she strives for a solo career. The parallels are obvious with her older peers.

Another excellent feature of the film comes in the form of interviews from the likes of Bruce Springsteen, Sting, Stevie Wonder, Lou Adler, Chris Botti, and Mick Jagger. We also see some studio shots featuring Phil Spector (once the hottest music producer, now incarcerated), and concert footage of Talking Heads, Ray Charles, The Rolling Stones, and the Concert for 20 feet3Bangladesh. It’s especially fitting to see Luther Vandross as a back-up singer to David Bowie‘s “Young Americans“, and to hear from Sheryl Crow, who worked as Michael Jackson’s back-up/lead female. These are the examples of the back-ups who successfully made the walk.

My only minor quibble with the film is structural, not content. Neville has an over-whelming task of addressing each of the individual stories, while also relating it to the nasty and unfair music business, the Civil Rights movement, the development of Rock and Roll, and the role that “talent” plays in what Springsteen terms the “complicated” walk from back-up to lead singer (the titular 20 feet). The segment focusing on Merry Clayton’s role in Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Sweet Home Alabama” is especially poignant. Overall this film is fascinating and entertaining, and makes a great companion piece to Standing in the Shadows of Motown (2002) and Muscle Shoals (2013).  Whether or not you are a fan of documentaries, this is a film to be enjoyed by all.

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWyUJcA8Zfo


THE EAST (2013)

July 1, 2013

east1 Greetings again from the darkness. Co-writer and director Zal Batmanglij re-teams with his Sound of My Voice co-writer and actress Brit Marling (Another Earth) to deliver another cult-based story. This time they focus on big, bad corporations and the eco-terrorists who target them.

Ms. Marling’s character is hired by Patricia Clarkson’s Security Company that specializes in protecting big corporations from the terrorist attacks and acts of revenge that these cults of anarchists perpetuate. Marling goes undercover to learn the secrets of The East, one of the particularly aggressive cult-like groups. The leader of The East is played by Alexander Skarsgard, who works with an overly-zealous and bitter Ellen Page and former med student Toby Kebbell.

east3 Are these idealists, anarchists, eco-activists or eco-terrorists? Is their “eye for an eye” philosophy a form of retribution or is it meant to draw attention so that a wrong can be righted? Are there extremes to which they won’t go? This group doesn’t seem united in their answers to these questions, though their deep woods hangout draws comparisons to Charles Manson’s compound.

As Marling becomes part of the group, she participates in the “jams”, which are the actual strikes against the companies and the decision makers in charge. Specifically, they give a pharmaceutical giant a taste of their own medicine … getting the desired results, which they watch online. Of course, there is always the risk of prison and/or injury and things don’t always go according to plan.

east4 The cast is pretty talented and also includes Jason Ritter, Shiloh Fernandez and Julia Ormond. The story will remind a bit of Sound of My Voice, and also Martha Marcy May Marlene. In other words, the attraction of the cult and commitment to cause. The set-up to the story is very well done, and it’s no real surprise as opposing ideals and conflicts creep into a group of idealists. Is violence necessary or are there more effective methods to make one’s protest heard and spur change? While the movie lacks the edge of the best indies, it still makes for good movie discussion … and crosses into real life beliefs and, personal and political stances.

**NOTE: Brit Marling is one of those rare combinations of Writer/Actress, and she is talented at both. She would be a wise choice as a prediction of future Oscar winner at some point … the only question is whether that will come as a writer or actress.

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: you are a fan of Sound of My Voice and/or Martha Marcy May Marlene OR you’re in the mood for a intriguing story during this time of blockbuster summer releases OR you just want to see Alexander Skarsgard in full scraggily mode

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you refuse to believe big corporations would never put profit above public well-being OR you’re looking for a few good laughs (not sure this one has even one)

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oPoTrnHQ3I


WHITE HOUSE DOWN (2013)

June 30, 2013

WHD1 Greetings again from the darkness. Director Roland Emmerich loves destroying buildings. In Godzilla, he crushed Manhattan. The Statue of Liberty was trashed in The Day After Tomorrow. Independence Day saw The White House explode, and, as you would expect by the title, The White House gets pretty banged up again in his latest. We have come to expect summertime big, slightly dumb, action-packed popcorn movies, and this one certainly fits the bill (emphasis on dumb).

Relased just 3 months after Olympus Has Fallen, the plot is similar, but the approach is diametrically opposite. Emmerich seems to think he gets a free pass thanks to a steady stream of punchlines … spread amongst most every character. Hey, it’s a parody of action films so if you don’t like it, you must not “get it”. Unfortunately, we do get it and it’s just not that funny … the action is weak … the CGI appears shortcut … and the characters ring hollow. Through it’s numerous similarities and tips of the cap, Emmerich seems to beg us to compare it to the class of this genre … Die Hard (1988). WHD2We’ve all seen Die Hard, and sir, this is no Die Hard.

Channing Tatum takes on the lead action role, though he is working with a safety net … the buddy picture element supplied by Jamie Foxx. Unfortunately Tatum has neither the acting chops or the screen presence to pull off the lead, and Foxx’s President Sawyer is simply a poorly conceived character. Tatum’s daughter is played by Joey King, who was so good in Crazy Stupid Love.  Here she plays the role of smarter-than-adults kid and is clearly designed to be the patriotic heart of the film.

For these type of films to work, we need a nasty bad guy. James Woods is fun to watch as he chews scenery as the Secret Service Director. He holds one of the numerous personal grudges against the government and the faceless “Military WHD3Industrial Complex”. Woods’ number one guy on the assault team is Jason Clarke, who was last seen in a key role in Zero Dark Thirty (no coincidence, I’m sure). The rest of the supporting cast is pretty much wasted, including a miscast Maggie Gylenhaal, Richard Jenkins, and the always fun Michael Murphy (where has he been?).

There is nothing wrong with pure escapism, but rather than compare this to the classic 1988 Die Hard, it really has more in common with this year’s mediocre A Good Day to Die Hard. If you prefer your White House terrorist attack movies to be serious and full out action, then Olympus Has Fallen is the better call. Instead, if your preference is strained one-liners, an awkward buddy-film and hazy bad guy motivation, then White House Down might do it for you.

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: three months is the maximum amount of time you can go without a new attack on the White House action flick OR you just need some pure escapism with a stream of punchlines during what should be a high-tension event

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you prefer your action flicks to focus on action and not slapstick comedy OR you are already convinced Channing Tatum is less talented than Jason Statham despite his appearance in most movies these days (admitted exaggeration)

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AXbiCdmXgw


WORLD WAR Z (2013)

June 24, 2013

wwz1 Greetings again from the darkness. Max Brooks’ hugely successful novel was put through the proverbial wringer on it’s road to the big screen. Numerous script re-writes, many scenes re-shot, a re-worked third act, an all new ending, and a 6 month delay in release date. The final product is something that fans of TV’s “The Walking Dead” will probably appreciate and many others will find it entertaining enough.

Brad Pitt gives an earnest effort as a former United Nations investigator who now enjoys his new role as house-husband. In fact, director Marc Foster (Quantum of Solace, Monster’s Ball) zaps us with the first zombie action just after Pitt serves up pancakes to his two daughters and wife Karin (Mireille Enos, “The Killing”). It turns out Pitt is more than just an expert at flapjacks. His expertise is needed in this global zombie crisis brought on by a wwz2virus …or bacteria, that started in India … or Israel … or Asia. See, those details don’t really matter because the infection has spread to every corner of the globe.

I actually enjoyed Pitt more in the “quiet” moments than in the big CGI action sequences. He is quite believable as a doting husband and father, less so as the world’s savior. Still, the issues with this movie are not on Mr. Pitt. Four writers (in addition to the novelist) rarely deliver a coherent script’ however, since it’s an apocalyptic zombie thriller, they almost get away with it! If you haven’t visited the zombie genre in a few decades, be prepared … these aren’t wwz3the sluggish zombies made famous by George Romero. Instead, these are blazingly fast and able to leap tall buildings, flying helicopters … and the great wall of Jerusalem. Yes, Jerusalem. In one of the more unusual movie features, this one plays like “Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?”. Pitt globe trots more than James Bond or Jason Bourne.

For many, the zombie sequences and global apocalyptic theme will provide sufficient cinematic entertainment. For the rest of us, it’s fine, but will forgotten as quickly as I am Legend. (06/24/13 UPDATE: the very talented and influential writer Richard Matheson passed away yesterday.  Among his work was the novel I AM LEGEND, which was the basis for the Will Smith movie that I referenced in my ending wisecrack.  I don’t blame Mr. Matheson’s fine work for that lackluster film.  His death is a great loss.)

**NOTE: Israeli newcomer Daniella Kurtesz (age 23) has an interesting screen presence and I look forward to seeing more of her work

**NOTE: Matthew Fox has a blink and you’ll miss him scene as part of the rooftop helicopter rescue team. The original third act had him playing a bigger role.

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: you are a fan of the Zombie craze OR you never miss a chance to see a long-haired Brad Pitt

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you are bothered more by muddled story-telling than the global threat of a rapidly spreading zombie virus.

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md6Dvxdr0AQ


MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING (2013)

June 23, 2013

much ado1 Greetings again from the darkness. The previous movie version of William Shakespeare’s play “Much Ado About Nothing” was directed in 1993 by Kenneth Branagh, who also directed Thor (2011). This modernized, much simpler version is directed by Joss Whedon, who also directed The Avengers last year. It’s difficult to imagine a more oddball movie symmetry than that! Whedon’s production plays almost like a home movie, and in a way it is. Filmed at the director’s Santa Monica house with a cast featuring mostly a close group of his friends … those that frequently gather for Shakespeare dinner parties … this one exudes a certain joy and love of the material from all involved, with a live theatre feel.

I have always been more attracted to Shakespeare’s comedies than his more famous tragedies. His startling wordsmithing is much ado3always filled with an edge and is borne of real personalities we all recognize. Combine that with director Whedon’s love of rapid-fire, wise-cracking dialogue and we get something from the ilk of Preston Sturges or Howard Hawks screwball comedies.

The banter and battle of wits between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) are at the heart of the story. Their flirtations are recognizable as two who doth protest too much … as if it could hide their mutual attraction. In one of the most pure comedic roles from the pen of Shakespeare comes Dogberry, the detective on the case of the dark conspiracy occurring right under the noses of most characters. Nathan Fillion (“Castle”) plays Dogberry in such a manner that he steals every scene in which he appears … both verbally and physically. He provides some laugh out loud moments.

much ado3 You will recognize some of the others in Whedon’s acting troupe: Reed Diamond plays Don Pedro, Clark Gregg as Leonato, and Fran Kranz as Claudio. Newcomer Jillian Morgese plays Hero, the falsely-accused bride-to-be, whose misfortunes lead to the great Dogberry scenes.

The temptation here is to say that a very entertaining movie can be made simply, cheaply and quickly (12 days filming). Of course, as wonderful as Amy Acker is, the real star is the story and words from William Shakespeare … even in this modernized setting. As we all know, “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”. Whedon and his cronies prove this.  I’m not sure this is the best indoctrination to Shakespeare, but I believe only the most traditional of Shakespeare devotees will not find some joy in this version.

SEE THIS MOVIE IF: you are a fan of The Bard and enjoy seeing varying visual interpretations of his fantastic work

SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you are the firm traditionalist who believes Shakespeare only belongs on stage or on paper

watch the trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAMsDP_DMHE