GLADIATOR II (2024)

November 22, 2024

Greetings again from the darkness. Like many of you, I’m not usually a fan of sequels. Too often they feel like a money grab or an unapologetically opportunistic way to capitalize on previous success without much creativity or artistry required. Of course, there are exceptions. Sometimes sequels advance the story or offer additional development on an interesting character. So where does this one fit? It’s been almost a quarter-century since GLADIATOR (2000) received 12 Oscar nominations, winning 5, including Best Picture. The original is a film I revere. Director Ridley Scott is back at the helm, and at age 86, he proves he’s still a master of scope and scale and visceral action sequences.

Russell Crowe is not back for this one, and if you saw the first film, you understand why. Crowe is shown in a couple of flashbacks and is mentioned periodically. But this film belongs to Paul Mescal as Lucius, a natural leader and preternatural fighting soldier. That last sentence probably seems like a mistake to anyone who has seen Mescal in ALL OF US STRANGERS (2023), AFTERSUN (2022), or THE LOST DAUGHTER (2021). In each of those films, his talent and presence were obvious, yet he gave no indication of being able to play a tough warrior. After bulking up for the role, Mescal proceeds to step into movie stardom, as he truly commands the screen.

Much like Maximus (Crowe) in the first film, Lucius (Mescal) is forced into slavery, which translates into Gladiator training and fighting for Macrinus (two-time Oscar winner Denzel Washington). However, this comes after one of the most intense and ferocious opening battle scenes we’ve ever witnessed on screen. During this battle, Lucius’ wife Arishat (Yuval Gonin), a fierce warrior herself, is killed by the Roman General Acacius (Pedro Pascal, “The Mandolorian”), setting off grief and a thirst for revenge in Lucius. Once he’s witnessed Lucius fighting, the overly ambitious and conniving Macrinus pegs Lucius as driven by “the rage”, and sees him as a secret weapon in his quest for power.

Acacius turns out to be husband of Lucilla (Connie Nielsen reprising her role) and is hailed a Roman hero by the goofball twin emperors Geta (Joseph Quinn, A QUIET PLACE: DAY ONE, 2024) and Caracalla (Fred Hechinger, THELMA, 2024). Lucilla has maintained her clandestine connection to the council, led by Gracchus (a returning Derek Jacobi, now 84 years old). Political maneuvering and desire for power are at the forefront for most of these characters, yet it’s Lucius and his determination that harken back to the themes of the original … oh, and a very personal connection that most will have figured out from the trailer.

The Colosseum battles (and effects) are spectacular, and include a tribe of saber-toothed baboons, a giant and ferocious prehistoric rhinoceros, and a shiver (that’s what it’s called) of hungry sharks that appear once the Colosseum floor is flooded. There’s a certain satirical symmetry to using sharks to ‘jump the shark’. Although the sharks are a bit questionable (and likely not historically accurate), the best and most brutal fighting occurs mano y mano. Of course, we know that Lucius will get his shot at revenge, and maybe even redemption … the only questions are how and when.

Paul Mescal handles the role of Lucius with aplomb, and Denzel Washington appears to be having an extraordinarily good time as power-hungry Macrinus – a significant (and welcome) departure from his usual roles. Additionally, the technical aspects of the film are stellar. Ridley Scott brings back many of his previous collaborators from the 2000 film. John Mathieson is back as Cinematographer, while Arthur Max and Janty Yates return as Production Designer and Costume Designer, respectively. This sequel is co-written by David Scarpa and Peter Craig, and David Franzoni gets credit for his original characters. Arguments can be made both ‘for’ and ‘against’ the need for this sequel, especially since the look and tone are so similar to the original. However, very few can claim that this is anything but an entertaining spectacle loaded with stunning visuals – and a straightforward link to the original. The two films can rightfully claim strength and honor. It should be noted that Ridley Scott has already announced plans for a third film in the series, and by nature, I fall right back into my skeptical self, questioning the need.

Opening wide in theaters on November 22, 2024

WATCH THE TRAILER


ROLE PLAY (2024)

January 11, 2024

Greetings again from the darkness. The spouse living a double life is territory covered many times by many movies over many years. When done well, it’s an intriguing premise and fertile ground for a fascinating character – one who can flip the switch between a ‘normal’ family life and one of intense danger. What’s rare is for the oblivious spouse to be the more interesting character, yet that’s exactly what happens in this film from director Thomas Vincent and screenwriter Seth W Owen.

Kaley Cuoco stars as Emma Brackett, and David Oyelowo co-stars as her husband, Dave. Ms. Cuoco shot to fame with her role as Penny on the long-running TV series “The Big Bang Theory”, which she followed up with leading roles in “The Flight Attendant” and “Harley Quinn”. This is her latest shot at establishing herself as a movie actress. Mr. Oyelowo is best known for his dramatic turns in SELMA (2014) and THE MIDNIGHT SKY (2020), and the new series “Lawmen: Bass Reeves”.

Emma is a contract assassin who works all over the world using disguises (mostly wigs) and aliases, while telling Dave, the nicest, most trusting man on Earth, that she is off to yet another generic work conference in Nebraska or some other unexciting locale. When home, Emma is a good mother to their two kids, and clearly enjoys their life in suburban New Jersey. When work beckons, Dave unwittingly accepts her reason for travel, having no clue that she’ll return with blood on her hands.

On their seventh anniversary, Dave suggests they spice things up a bit with some role play. Their planned ‘happenstance’ meeting as strangers at a hotel bar goes sideways thanks to the intrusion of an unwelcome third wheel named Bob Kellerman. The always fabulous Bill Nighy plays Kellerman, and we find ourselves wishing he had more screen time. It turns out, this encounter leads to Emma being outed, which sends Dave into emotional turmoil (a terrific scene) … and an ill-advised meetup at her latest job.

Additional support work is provided by Connie Nielsen as the demented woman who raised and trained Emma, and their final meeting provides the impetus for the third act. Other than Bill Nighy’s too-brief role, the best part of the film is seeing rare comedic chops from David Oyelowo. It’s a joy to see such a well-respected and talented actor show yet another side on screen. Kaley Cuoco doesn’t fare quite as well, as her TV sitcom approach defies believability. For those in search of some mindless entertainment with a side dose of action, the movie should work just fine.

Opens nationwide in theaters on January 12, 2024

WATCH THE TRAILER


NOBODY (2021)

March 25, 2021

Greetings again from the darkness. Revenge movies have long been popular because they let us live out the fantasy of getting even … a chance real life rarely offers. Of course, few of us actually cross paths with Russian mobsters or have a secret life that requires our government personnel file be redacted. But all of the above is in play for director Ilya Naishuller’s first feature film since his debut, HARDCORE HENRY (2015), an innovate POV action/sci-fi movie.

While watching this, numerous other movies kept popping into my head, but front-and-center were the JOHN WICK movies. It wasn’t until afterwards that I discovered this film’s writer was Derek Kolstad, the creator and writer of the first three John Wick movies to date. Knowing that leads to the obvious comparison of leading men – Keanu Reeves versus Bob Odenkirk. Yep, the same Bob Odenkirk who owns the Saul Goodman role from “Breaking Bad” and its terrific spinoff, “Better Call Saul”. And nope, he’s not as cool as Keanu, but it’s the risk of casting against type that prevents this from being same old, same old.

Odenkirk stars as Hutch Mansell, a suburban husband and father, working as a bookkeeper at the shop owned by his father-in-law (Michael Ironside, TOTAL RECALL, 1990). A brilliantly edited opening sequence shows us the daily drudgery of Hutch’s life. The rapid cuts tell the story of a man whose existence involves taking the bus to a dead-end job, filling his coffee cup, receiving little respect or affection from family, and yelling at the backend of a garbage truck. Things only get worse when, one night, intruders break into his home. His teenage son (Gage Munroe) springs into action, but Hutch freezes, and is viewed as weak by just about everyone.

It’s at this point where Hutch awakens – his secret past coming back to life. Now you might chuckle a bit at the thought of Odenkirk playing a man who once was so dangerous, he was known as an “auditor” … the last person you want to see at your door. Well, that’s not likely to be your last chuckle, because the over-the-top moments are just getting started. Hutch fights a group of thugs on a city bus, and the one that dies just happens to be the little brother of Russian mobster kingpin Yulian, played with gusto by Aleksey Serebryakov (LEVIATHAN, 2014). Like us, Yulian underestimates Hutch, and most of the movie is spent with every living Russian gangster trying to end Hutch.

Hopefully by now you have intuited that Naishuller’s movie is cartoonish in nature, and has no sense of realism or logic. If you’re not quite sure yet, you should know that 82 year old Christopher Lloyd (as Hutch’s ex-FBI father) joins in on the action – and I mean, he actually joins in on the shootouts. Think of “Mayhem” from the Allstate commercials and you get some idea of the exaggerated shoot ‘em up/ blow ‘em up nature of the action. Connie Nielsen (GLADIATOR, 2000) plays Hutch’s wife and RZA plays Hutch’s equally talented brother.

If one squints and twists, there is some insight into today’s emasculated male – those more likely to bake lasagna than take down an intruder. But mostly it’s just exaggerated revenge action in a way that mirrors John Wick, rather than DEATH WISH (1974) or STRAW DOGS (1971). Director Naishuller gets extra credit for poking fun at the never-ending ammo issue in most action movies, and it might have benefitted from a bit more humor along the lines of the kitty cat bracelet. Fans of the John Wick movies will likely find enjoyment here, but probably “nobody” else … especially those looking for Saul Goodman cleverness.

This film opens March 26, 2021

WATCH THE (Red Band) TRAILER


WONDER WOMAN 1984

December 26, 2020

 Greetings again from the darkness. Some of the key elements that make Wonder Woman appealing is that she’s smart, she’s nice, she’s dedicated to doing good, she’s grounded in her history, and her use of her powers makes sense (in a comic book kind of way). Most of that holds true in filmmaker Patty Jenkins’ sequel to her 2017 blockbuster WONDER WOMAN. So why did that one work so well, while this one falls short? It’s not an easy question to answer, though it could be as simple as having the wrong target.

Gal Gadot returns as Diana Prince, and this time she’s plopped into 1984 (the year, not the novel). This creates a cornucopia of opportunity for social commentary and satire from Ms. Jenkins and her co-writers Geoff Johns and Dave Callaham. After all, it was the era of atrocious popular music, outlandish fashion, and a relentless pursuit of greed by the “me” generation. The film pounces on each of these by using the return of Diana’s main squeeze, Steve Trevor (Chris Pine), as a device for highlighting the absurdity of belly bags and pastel tank tops for men. In the first movie, the WWI pilot wakes up in Themyscira, and this time, he just kind of materializes in the year of GHOSTBUSTERS, shopping malls, and President Ronald Reagan. While this certainly qualifies as extreme culture shock, the parade of outfits and Steve’s wide-eyed tour through the city are over-the-top, even for their attempted comedic effect.

Over-the-top also describes the film’s two main villains. Pedro Pascal (“Game of Thrones”) plays TV hypester and con man Maxwell Lord. He’s a greedy, self-centered man willing to do anything to get “more”. Kristen Wiig is Barbara Minerva, a bumbling, forgettable klutz who works at the same museum as Diana. She simply wants to be cool like Diana and have people acknowledge her existence. Things shift quickly thanks to the Dreamstone sitting in Barbara’s in-box waiting for research. What follows is more than two hours of seeing the fallout of people having their wishes come true. If you’ve learned anything about human nature during this pandemic year, then you won’t be surprised at how people react to gaining power.

Maxwell Lord is not dissimilar to Lex Luthor in SUPERMAN (1978), as his goal is ultimate power and control – though to what end, he’s not sure. Barbara Minerva was never really power hungry, but a taste of it was much to her liking, and she transitions to The Cheetah for Wonder Woman’s biggest fight scene. There is also a message about what one sacrifices to have their wishes come true. This aspect of the film could be psychoanalyzed were one so inclined. Lord’s relationship with his son is convoluted, and the early Barbara is a mess … making their “sacrifices” a bit less obvious than that of Diana.

The opening sequence is the one this viewer most enjoyed. Spectacular camera work takes us to a competition on Themyscira, as a very young Diana (Lilly Aspell returns) goes against the grown warriors, while Antiope (Robin Wright) and Hippolyta (Connie Nielsen) look on and teach hard life lessons. Not only do these actors return, but most of Ms. Jenkins’ WONDER WOMAN crew is back, including cinematographer Matthew Jensen. The changes include Film Editor Richard Pearson and Hans Zimmer provides the new score. Some of the dialogue is tough to take. As an example, Diana says “I don’t know what to think, Steve. I only hope I’m wrong.” And later, Steve explains, “Flying is easy. It’s only wind and air.” Dialogue like this makes us want to renounce our own wishes. It may be one film later than it should have been, but Ms. Jenkins does deliver a much-appreciated cameo at film’s end, and if nothing else, it leaves us wondering, ‘what would you give up for a wish?’

watch the trailer