SHELL (2025)

October 3, 2025

Greetings again from the darkness. Every one of us wants to look good and feel good. But how far will we go? What if our livelihood depended on looking young? There is no denying that societal pressures favor those who are pleasing to the eye, and of course, Hollywood is the poster child for rewarding beauty and youth … and penalizing, or at least ignoring, the other end of the spectrum. The second film from director Max Minghella (his first was TEEN SPIRIT, 2018) features a screenplay from Jack Stanley (THE PASSENGER, 2023), and it likely pays a price for coming on the heels of last year’s THE SUBSTANCE (2024), a body horror film with a similar theme, but one that was far more extreme.

The film opens with a terrific sequence with the rarely seen Elizabeth Berkley (SHOWGIRLS, 1995) as Jenna Janero. The sequence firmly establishes that we’re in for a ‘body horror’ ride; although unfortunately, this is one of the best scenes for quite a while. We then meet Samantha Lake (Elisabeth Moss, “Mad Men”), a struggling actor who has hit the dreaded age of 40 – a poor ‘choice’ in Hollywood. Sam’s career peak seems to have passed her by and now she’s auditioning for roles against much younger actors – including Chloe Benson (Kaia Gerber, SATURDAY NIGHT, 2022), whom Sam babysat years ago.

After a professional nudge, Sam finds herself at Shell Corporation, a strange place that promises its clients vitality and the end of aging. The Director and face of the company is Zoe Shannon (Kate Hudson, ALMOST FAMOUS, 2000), a 68-year-old woman who doesn’t look a day over 40. Not surprisingly, delivering youth to women is extremely lucrative, and Zoe lives her luxurious lifestyle in a stunning mansion. Oh, there is a downside … some clients have to be ‘disappeared’ when the side effects pop up.

Dressed in a ridiculous oversized Columbo trench coat (supposedly to trick us into believing Ms. Moss is a hefty woman), Sam is a bit reluctant at first to join the Shell program. All it takes is handsome and smooth-talking Dr. Hubert (Arian Moayed, “Inventing Anna”) to ease her into the program. Soon Sam and Zoe are buddies and spending a great deal of time together, relishing their youthful looks and subsequent riches.

Of course, all fantasies must come crashing down at some point, and although her psoriasis is gone, the side effects cause the worst Vanity Fair interview in history, and lead to an extreme third act. Dr. Thadeus Brand (Peter MacNicol, “Ally McBeal”), the inventor of Shell returns for Sam’s debrief. His use of lobster enzymes comes into play, resulting in a sequence of splatter.

It’s a bit odd that the film never capitalizes on women taking power, or even taking control of their own life. Although Kate Hudson does nice work here, I couldn’t help but think that casting Gwyneth Paltrow would have added a touch of irony. Este Haim provides a bit of support work as Sam’s assistant and friend, and the focus pretty much remains on the obsession/pursuit of youth and beauty – at any cost. Director Max Minghella is best known as an actor (“The Handmaid’s Tale”) and as the son of Oscar winning director Anthony Minghella (THE ENGLISH PATIENT, 1996). It’s likely meant as satire, but the film strikes so close to today’s societal pressures, especially on women, that we can’t help but be a bit saddened by it. One thing’s certain … there was a missed opportunity for the B52’s “Rock Lobster”.

In Select Theatres & On Digital October 3, 2025

WATCH THE TRAILER


GAME CHANGE (2012)

March 13, 2012

 Greetings again from the darkness. One sided films can be made about race, gender, religion, occupations and hobbies. One sided films about politics, however, tend to wreak as much havoc as the actual politics. HBO’s latest from director Jay Roach and writer Danny Strong (the team behind Recount) is based on the bestseller from political writers Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. Just as the book did, the film will bring enjoyment and confirmation to the left wingers and much pain and anger to the staunch right wingers … at least those who are unable, even 4 years later, to view the story with a hint of objectivity.

I am not here to debate the political sides of the story, but rather to address how it is presented. The thing that really stands out are the Emmy-caliber performances of Ed Harris (as John McCain), Julianne Moore (as Sarah Palin) and Woody Harrelson (as Steve Schmidt). McCain comes across as a man with true ideals and integrity, who gets caught up in the ambitious push to become President. Palin is presented as the “high risk, high reward” gamble that initially pays dividends, but ultimately backfires. Schmidt is really the key to the story as the campaign strategist who accurately reads the climate, but then fails to do his homework before turning in his assignment.

 The story follows the evolution of the Palin story. McCain’s campaign needs a “WOW” factor and the Alaska Governor provides an energetic, charismatic woman who quickly captures the imagination of the public and media. She then fades under the pressure of being separated from her family, having family secrets publicized, and most crucially, her lack of depth on basic foreign and domestic issues. The note-card budget for this movie must have set a record.

We get a peek behind the curtain of a Presidential campaign, and see the shock on the faces of Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace (played by Sarah Paulson) as they realize too late just what they are dealing with in Palin. It was painful enough to watch what was presented to the public during this actual campaign, but to see what was going on behind the scenes is pure agony.

 Where the movie does its best work is in capsulizing what really happened in this 2008 campaign. We hear Schmidt ask, do you think the people want a “Statesman” (McCain) or a “Celebrity” (Obama)? That really is the key observation on the race. One candidate lacked real a connective personality, but fought for his country and served more upon his return. The other had few accomplishments, but had a dynamic personality that drove him to quickly become one of the most recognizable faces on the planet. McCain mentions “the dark side of the American populism“.  Schmidt understood the need for celebrity and poof … Palin appeared!

The last segment of the film provides a glimpse into the power-hungry, or at least celebrity-enjoying phase of Sarah Palin, and it looks like that persona is still going strong four years later. Even at this stage of the primaries, she mentions that she is open to being President.  The film does provide some insight into the pressures of managing a campaign on the highest stage and I found it quite interesting … even though I had to relive the chagrin I felt as each layer was peeled back on Palin in 2008.

watch the trailer: