MUNICH: THE EDGE OF WAR (2022)

January 21, 2022

Greetings again from the darkness. It seems reasonable to ask why someone didn’t take it upon themselves to stop Hitler before things went so far. Of course we now have 80 years of hindsight to benefit our thoughts, but surely there were those who recognized the reign of terror brewing. The 2017 international best-selling novel, “Munich”, by Robert Harris, has been adapted for the screen by writer Ben Powers, and is directed by Christian Schwochow. It has the look and feel of a political spy thriller, right down to the clandestine meetings, smoking jackets, and heavy mahogany furniture in the conference rooms.

George Mackay (WOLF, 2021) stars as Hugh Legat, and Jannis Niewohner co-stars as Paul von Hartman. We first see them as 1932 Oxford classmates with their mutual friend, Lenya (Liv Lisa Fries) … one English, one German, and one Jewish. A ferocious disagreement over Hitler sent the three friends off in different directions. It’s not until late in the film that we discover what happened to Lenya, but the bulk of the story features Hugh as an attaché to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain (Oscar winner Jeremy Irons), and Paul as a German diplomat under the Fuhrer (Hitler is played by Ulrich Matthes who was Goebbels in DOWNFALL).

The timeline revolves around the build-up to the 1938 Munich agreement, just on the brink of WWII. Chamberlain remains focused on avoiding war, while Paul has secured documentation proving Hitler’s plan goes far beyond taking on the Sudetenland area of Czechoslovakia. Paul remains loyal to his homeland, but understands Hitler must be stopped. Working with Helen Winter (played by Sandra Huller), his co-conspirator and paramour, they devise a plan to get the documents to Paul’s old friend Hugh, in hopes that he will deliver to Chamberlain so that Hitler’s vision of domination can be stopped.

This is a dramatized and fictionalized version of what transpired, and Chamberlain’s legacy is still debated to this day. Did Hitler outmaneuver him or was Chamberlain buying needed time to build up the military and garner strength with allies? It’s great fun to watch Mr. Irons jump into this role, even if this is a favorable and somewhat forgiving view of Chamberlain’s approach. The tension is created as old pals Paul and Hugh secretly unite in cause, and is especially present in a scene where Paul is alone with Hitler. Unlike Chamberlain, the goal of the former classmates is to stop Hitler, not just stop or delay a war.

History buffs may cringe a few times, but for an entertaining political drama inspired by history, the film delivers enough to keep us interested. The weakest links involve Hugh’s struggles at home with his wife Pamela (Jessica Brown Findlay), who doesn’t understand why her husband can’t explain to her what’s happening at work. Performances from Mr. Irons and Mr. Niewohner are quite interesting, as is the provided quote, “Hoping is waiting for someone else to do it”.

Available on Netflix beginning January 21, 2022

WATCH THE TRAILER


VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN (2015)

November 24, 2015

victor frankenstein Greetings again from the darkness. If a filmmaker is going to mess with the classics, there are two paths of creativity from which to choose: stay true to the original, or put a new spin on it. In this case, the classics in question are the nearly 200 year old novel from Mary Shelley (1818) and the nearly 85 year old movie from James Whale (1931). The filmmakers doing the messing are director Paul McGuigan (Lucky Number Slevin) and screenwriter Max Landis (son of director John). The spin they chose was (in theory) to tell the story from the perspective of Igor, the loyal assistant to Dr. Frankenstein.

It’s an interesting approach, but one that immediately presents a problem … since the title they chose was not “Igor”, but rather Victor Frankenstein. The film does begin with Igor’s backstory in the circus as a hunchbacked clown/amateur doctor, and the character does provide some early and late narration. The conundrum stems from the fact that pretty much everything else in the movie is centered on the mad scientist, rather than the skilled apprentice/partner.

Daniel Radcliffe plays Igor and James McAvoy plays Victor Frankenstein (not Fron-kin-steen, in a nod to Mel Brooks), and both actors seem to be doing everything possible to bring energy and enthusiasm to a movie that can’t seem to decide if it’s a reboot or a reimagination or simply an origin story. Radcliffe effectively uses his physicality as the circus clown who is so mistreated and misunderstood, and McAvoy is such a hyper-active mad scientist that I’m sure his fellow actors many times were inclined to advise “say it, don’t spray it”.  McAvoy does seem to be having a grand old time playing the brilliant yet unhinged young doctor-to-be, and to his credit takes a much different approach than Colin Clive when he gets to the infamous line “It’s ALIVE!”

The best parts of the movie are the intricate and amazing sets, the monster himself (albeit too brief), and the expert use of classical music and film score. The circus sets are colorful and active, while Frankenstein’s soap factory home/laboratory is fascinating and creative, and the final Scotland castle on a cliff is breath-taking. Pulleys, chains and cranks are everywhere … as is an incredible amount of body parts, organs and fluids.

After a very well done circus opening, we are jarred with a seemingly out of place action sequence involving a slo-motion chase and fight scene that seems to be attempting to mimic some of the recent Sherlock Holmes movie stunts. Here they are unwelcome and ruin the flow. Another aspect that seems forced and unnecessary is a romantic interlude between Igor and a trapeze artist (played by Jessica Brown Findlay). It feels like an add-on to remind us that it’s supposed to be Igor’s story. Additionally, Andrew Scott plays an intriguing Scotland Yard Inspector who is every bit as obsessed with his faith-based beliefs as Victor is with his science-has-no-bounds stance. A story told from the Inspector’s perspective might have worked, but instead it comes across as another add-on. Another add-on is the filthy rich and very devious fellow med student (played by Freddie Fox) who agrees to fund the experiments, but mostly the character is an after-thought necessary to move the plot along. Wasted is the always menacing Charles Dance, who has but one scene as Victor’s strongly disapproving daddy.

A combination of the romance, minimal role of Igor in the grand finale, the medical school bumbling, the clunky Inspector involvement, and the all too brief monster appearance makes the film all but impossible for viewers to connect. They tell us twice “You know the story … a crack of lightning, a mad genius, and an unholy creation”, but the reality is, the fact that we know the story, makes this one all the more disappointing. It’s fun to look at, but is lacking the depth and soul that has allowed Shelley’s book to stand up over two centuries.

watch the trailer: